CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Pieter Jansz (1612–1672)

Dutch glass painter, 1602-1672 (1612–1672)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ7192792 ↗
Source-derived summary

Pieter Jansz (c. 1612 Amsterdam – 1672, Amsterdam), was a Dutch Golden Age painter.

Biography

According to Houbraken, he was a good draughtsman who learned to paint from the Haarlem glass painter Jan Philipsz van Bouckhorst, whose works can still be seen in many Dutch churches. Both he and his teacher died in the rampjaar 1672. Jansz's own pupil was Jan Pietersz Zomer.

According to the RKD he painted, sculpted and made designs for book illustrations.

Editorial summary

“Pieter Jansz (1612–1672)” enters the record as dutch glass painter, 1602-1672 (1612–1672). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Pieter, Jansz and Dutch can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1612, 1672—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1612-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Pieter, Jansz and Dutch.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Pieter Jansz (1612–1672)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Pieter, Jansz and Dutch provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7192792. VIAF identifies the subject as 4308157704209544440008. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1612 and 1672.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pieter Jansz (1612–1672)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pieter Jansz (1612–1672) primary sources, Pieter Jansz (1612–1672) archive and Pieter research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pieter Jansz (1612–1672)”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Pieter Jansz (1612–1672)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.