Pierre-Thomas-Nicolas Hurtaut
French writer (1719-1791)
Pierre-Thomas-Nicolas Hurtaut (French pronunciation: [pjɛʁ tɔma nikɔla yʁto]; 17 April 1719 – 5 May 1791) was an 18th-century French historian and writer.
Short biographie
The son of a horse trader, Pierre-Thomas-Nicolas Hurtaut became Latin teacher at the École Militaire and published his first book, Le Voyage d'Aniers in 1748. Interested in the mysteries of the human body, he devoted several books to the topic, including L'Art de péter and Essai de médecine sur le flux menstruel in which he pastiched medicinal treaties. He was also a historian and a member of the Société du bout du banc.
Bibliography
1748: Le Voyage d'Aniers
1750: Coup d’œil anglais sur les cérémonies du mariage
1751: L'Art de péter
1754: Essai de médecine sur le flux menstruel
1770: Le Pacte du destin
1774: Iconologie historique des souverains d'Europe
1775: Abrégé historique et portatif des rois mérovingiens
1775: Dictionnaire des mots homonymes de la langue française
1779: Dictionnaire historique de la ville de Paris et de ses environs, (in collaboration with Magny).
“Pierre-Thomas-Nicolas Hurtaut” enters the record as french writer (1719-1791). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Pierre-Thomas-Nicolas, Hurtaut and French can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Pierre-Thomas-Nicolas Hurtaut” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Pierre-Thomas-Nicolas, Hurtaut and French provides the most credible route into that argument.
The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3383523. VIAF identifies the subject as 69036462. The Library of Congress control number is n90658020. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1719, 1791, 1748 and 1750.
Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Pierre-Thomas-Nicolas Hurtaut”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Pierre-Thomas-Nicolas Hurtaut primary sources, Pierre-Thomas-Nicolas Hurtaut archive and Pierre-Thomas-Nicolas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pierre-Thomas-Nicolas Hurtaut”?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Pierre-Thomas-Nicolas Hurtaut” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.