CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

La Minh Commune

commune in Bar Kaev District, Ratanakiri Province, Cambodia

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ6481973
Source-derived summary

La Minh Commune (Khmer: ឃុំឡាមីញ) is a commune in Bar Kaev District in northeast Cambodia. It contains five villages and has a population of 2,622.

In the 2007 commune council elections, all five seats went to members of the Cambodian People's Party. Land alienation is a severe problem in Laming.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “La Minh Commune” as commune in Bar Kaev District, Ratanakiri Province, Cambodia. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Minh, Commune and commune.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Minh, Commune and commune providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “La Minh Commune”, the useful work is to connect “commune in Bar Kaev District, Ratanakiri Province, Cambodia” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6481973. Authority coordinates are 13.687, 107.184. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2007.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “La Minh Commune”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow La Minh Commune primary sources, La Minh Commune archive and Minh research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “La Minh Commune”?
  2. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
  3. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from La Minh Commune” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.