CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Phricanthes flexilineana

species of insect

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ14090248 ↗
Source-derived summary

Phricanthes flexilineana is a species of moth of the family Tortricidae first described by Francis Walker in 1863. The species was described from Sri Lanka, northern Queensland in Australia and the Seychelles, but has a much wider range, which includes Madagascar, India, Indonesia, Myanmar, New Guinea, the Philippines and Taiwan. It is also widely distributed in the tropical parts of North and South America.

The larvae have been recorded feeding on Tetracera volubilis, Dillenia indica and Davilla nitia.

Editorial summary

“Phricanthes flexilineana” enters the record as species of insect. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Phricanthes, flexilineana and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1863—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Phricanthes, flexilineana and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Phricanthes flexilineana” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Phricanthes, flexilineana and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q14090248. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1863.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Phricanthes flexilineana”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Phricanthes flexilineana primary sources, Phricanthes flexilineana archive and Phricanthes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Phricanthes flexilineana”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Phricanthes flexilineana” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.