Sebastião Leme
series of prototype cameras designed by Sebastião Carvalho Leme

Sebastião Carvalho Leme (13 July 1918 – 25 April 2007), was a photographer from Marília, São Paulo, Brazil. He is credited with inventing the Leme panoramic camera, a 360° camera.
Summary
In 1957, an entrepreneur requested a picture of his buildings, which stood at three of the corners of a street-crossing, and he wanted to show the group of buildings in one single photo, which would have to cover 360°. Using a Rolleiflex with a panoramic head, ten negatives were taken that, enlarged and mounted, resulted in a 360° photo. Leme then addressed the challenge of taking a 360° photo in a single negative.
The demonstration of his eventual solution consisted of a lens mounted in a small, empty tomato purée can, an internal device which is the principle of the invention, and a piece of film fixed inside the can. He tested it in front of the Senai building by rotating the lens by hand. The film, when developed, precariously confirmed that it was possible to take 360° photos.
The first prototype was entirely mechanical. Three prototypes were made, and they were improved over one year.
“Sebastião Leme” enters the record as series of prototype cameras designed by Sebastião Carvalho Leme. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Sebastião, Leme and series can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Sebastião Leme” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Sebastião, Leme and series provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6521111. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1918, 2007 and 1957.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Sebastião Leme”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Sebastião Leme primary sources, Sebastião Leme archive and Sebastião research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sebastião Leme”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Sebastião Leme” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.