Photodetection
quantum process

In his historic paper entitled "The Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence," Roy J. Glauber set a solid foundation for the quantum electronics/quantum optics enterprise. The experimental development of the optical maser and later laser at that time had made the classical concept of optical coherence inadequate. Glauber started from the quantum theory of light detection by considering the process of photoionization in which a photodetector is triggered by an ionizing absorption of a photon. In the quantum theory of radiation, the electric field operator in the Coulomb gauge may be written as the sum of positive and negative frequency parts
E
(
r
,
t
)
=
E
(
+
)
(
r
,
t
)
+
E
(
−
)
(
r
,
t
)
{\displaystyle E(\mathbf {r} ,t)=E^{(+)}(\mathbf {r} ,t)+E^{(-)}(\mathbf {r} ,t)}
where
E
(
−
)
(
r
,
t
)
=
E
(
+
)
(
r
,
t
)
†
{\displaystyle E^{(-)}(\mathbf {r} ,t)=E^{(+)}(\mathbf {r} ,t)^{\dagger }}
One may expand
E
(
+
)
(
r
,
t
)
{\displaystyle E^{(+)}(\mathbf {r} ,t)}
in terms of the normal modes as follows:
E
(
+
)
(
r
,
t
)
=
i
∑
j
(
ℏ
ω
j
2
)
1
/
2
a
^
j
ε
j
e
i
(
k
j
⋅
r
−
ω
j
t
)
{\displaystyle E^{(+)}(\mathbf {r} ,t)=i\sum _{j}\left({\frac {\hbar \omega _{j}}{2}}\right)^{1/2}{\hat {a}}_{j}\mathbf {\varepsilon } _{j}e^{i(\mathbf {k} _{j}\cdot \mathbf {r} -\omega _{j}t)}}
where
ε
j
{\displaystyle \mathbf {\varepsilon } _{j}}
are the unit vectors of polarization; this expansion has the same form as the classical expansion except that now the field amplitudes
a
^
j
{\displaystyle {\hat {a}}_{j}}
are operators.
Glauber showed that, for an ideal photodetector situated at a point
r
{\displaystyle \mathbf {r} }
in a radiation field, the probability of observing a photoionization event in this detector between time
t
{\displaystyle {t}}
and
t
+
d
t
{\displaystyle {\it {t}}+d{\it {t}}}
is proportional to
W
I
(
r
,
t
)
d
t
{\displaystyle W_{I}(\mathbf {r} ,t)d{\it {t}}}
, where
W
I
(
r
,
t
)
=
⟨
ψ
∣
E
(
−
)
(
r
,
t
)
⋅
E
(
+
)
(
r
,
t
)
∣
ψ
⟩
{\displaystyle {W_{I}(\mathbf {r} ,t)}=\langle \psi \mid {E^{(-)}(\mathbf {r} ,t)}\cdot {E^{(+)}(\mathbf {r} ,t)}\mid \psi \rangle }
and
|
ψ
⟩
{\displaystyle |\psi \rangle }
specifies the state of the field. Since the radiation field is a quantum-mechanical one, we do not know the exact properties of the incident light, and the probability should be averaged, as in the classical theory, to be proportional to
⟨
a
^
j
†
a
^
j
⟩
{\displaystyle \langle {\hat {a}}_{j}^{\dagger }{\hat {a}}_{j}\rangle }
where the angular brackets mean an average over the light field. The significance of the quantum theory of coherence is in the ordering of the creation and destruction operators
a
^
j
†
{\displaystyle {\hat {a}}_{j}^{\dagger }}
and
a
^
j
{\displaystyle {\hat {a}}_{j}}
:
[
a
^
j
,
a
^
j
†
]
=
1
{\displaystyle [{\hat {a}}_{j},{\hat {a}}_{j}^{\dagger }]=1}
Since
a
^
j
†
a
^
j
{\displaystyle {\hat {a}}_{j}^{\dagger }{\hat {a}}_{j}}
is not equal to
a
^
j
a
^
j
†
{\displaystyle {\hat {a}}_{j}{\hat {a}}_{j}^{\dagger }}
for a light field, the order makes the quantum statistical measurements (such as photon counting) quite different from the classical ones, i.e., the nonclassical properties of light, such as photon antibunching.
Moreover, Glauber's theory of photodetection is of far-reaching fundamental significance to interpretation of quantum mechanics. The Glauber detection theory differs from the Born probabilistic interpretation, in that it expresses the meaning of physical law in terms of measured facts (relationships), counting events in the detection processes, without assuming the particle model of matter. These concepts quite naturally lead to a relational approach to quantum physics.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Photodetection” as quantum process. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as quantum process. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 8, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7187735. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Photodetection”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Photodetection primary sources, Photodetection archive and Photodetection research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Photodetection”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Photodetection” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.