CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Phong Mỹ

Commune in Đồng Tháp province, Vietnam.

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ10805453 ↗
Source-derived summary

Phong Mỹ is a commune in Đồng Tháp province, Vietnam. It is one of 102 communes and wards in the province following the 2025 reorganization.

Geography

Phong Mỹ is a commune in Đồng Tháp province, located approximately 110km northwest of Mỹ Tho ward. The commune has a geographical location:

To the south, it borders Mỹ Ngãi ward.

To the east, it borders Phương Thịnh commune.

To the north, it borders Phú Cường commune.

To the west, it borders Bình Thành commune and An Giang province.

History

Prior to 2025, Phong Mỹ commune was formerly Phong Mỹ commune and part of Gáo Giồng commune in Cao Lãnh district, Đồng Tháp province.

On June 12, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam issued Resolution No. 202/2025/QH15 on the reorganization of provincial-level administrative units.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Phong Mỹ” as commune in Đồng Tháp province, Vietnam. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Phong, Commune and Đồng.

Editorial reviewA valuable geographic starting point for tracing changing names, boundaries, uses and administrative responsibility. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2025—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Phong, Commune and Đồng providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Phong Mỹ”, the useful work is to connect “commune in Đồng Tháp province, Vietnam” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q10805453. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2025.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Phong Mỹ”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Phong Mỹ primary sources, Phong Mỹ archive and Phong research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Phong Mỹ”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Phong Mỹ” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.