CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Phlogiodes

genus of spiders

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 28, 2025
Entity authorityQ131806285
Source-derived summary

Phlogiodes is a genus of spiders in the tarantula family Theraphosidae, found in India. As of January 2025, a single species is accepted, Phlogiodes validus. The species has been transferred back and forth between Phlogiodes and Haploclastus.

Taxonomy

The genus Phlogiodes was erected by Reginald Pocock in 1899. He described two species, Phlogiodes validus from a male specimen and Phlogiodes robustus from a female specimen. He considered the male and female to be too different to be the same species. In 1985, Robert Raven sank Phlogiodes into Haploclastus. In 2010, Pocock's two Phlogiodes species were synonymized and transferred to Haploclastus as Haploclastus validus. In 2013, H. validus was restored to Phlogiodes, the placement accepted by the World Spider Catalog as of January 2025. In 2024, the species was again placed in Haploclastus.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Phlogiodes” as genus of spiders. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2025, 1899, 1985, 2010—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Phlogiodes, genus and spiders can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as genus of spiders. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 28, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q131806285. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2025, 1899, 1985 and 2010.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Phlogiodes”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Phlogiodes primary sources, Phlogiodes archive and Phlogiodes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Phlogiodes”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Phlogiodes” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.