CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Philip Johnson-Laird

British-American psychologist

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 31, 2026
Entity authorityQ450871
Source-derived summary

Philip Nicholas Johnson-Laird (born 12 October 1936) is a philosopher of language and reasoning and a developer of the mental model theory of reasoning. He was a professor at Princeton University's Department of Psychology, as well as the author of several notable books on human cognition and the psychology of reasoning.

Biography

He was educated at Culford School and University College London where he won the Rosa Morison Medal in 1964 and a James Sully Scholarship between 1964 and 1966. He achieved a BA there in 1964 and a PhD in 1967. He was elected to a Fellowship in 1994.

His entry in Who's Who (2007 edition) records the following career history:

Ten years of miscellaneous jobs, as surveyor, musician, hospital porter (alternative to National Service), librarian, before going to university.

Assistant Lecturer, then Lecturer, in Psychology, UCL, 1966–73

Visiting Member, Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, 1971–72

Reader, 1973, Professor, 1978, in Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex

Visiting Fellow, Stanford University, 1980

Assistant Director, MRC Applied Psychology Unit, University of Cambridge, 1983–89

Fellow, Darwin College, Cambridge, 1984–89

Visiting Professorships: Stanford University, 1985; Princeton Univ., 1986.

He joined the department of psychology at Princeton University in 1989, where he became the Stuart Professor of Psychology in 1994. He retired in 2012.

Johnson-Laird is a member of the American Philosophical Society, a Fellow of the Royal Society, a Fellow of the British Academy, a William James Fellow of the Association for Psychological Science, and a Fellow of the Cognitive Science Society.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Philip Johnson-Laird” as british-American psychologist. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Philip, Johnson-Laird and British-American.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1936, 1964, 1966, 1967—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1936-10-12. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Philip, Johnson-Laird and British-American providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Philip Johnson-Laird”, the useful work is to connect “british-American psychologist” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q450871. VIAF identifies the subject as 97935460. The Library of Congress control number is n50039821. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1936, 1964, 1966 and 1967.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Philip Johnson-Laird”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Philip Johnson-Laird primary sources, Philip Johnson-Laird archive and Philip research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Philip Johnson-Laird”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Philip Johnson-Laird” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.