CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Philippines at the 1924 Summer Olympics

sporting event delegation

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ2546283 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Philippines competed at the 1924 Summer Olympics in Paris, France, which were held from May 4 to July 27, 1924. The nation's participation at these Games marked its debut, and the debut of any Southeast Asian country, at the Summer Olympics. The delegation consisted of one athlete, sprinter David Nepomuceno, and two officials, attaché B. Minelle and athletics coach and executive officer Regino Ylanan. Two other athletes, Fortunato Catalon and Juan Taduran, were supposed to join Nepomuceno at the Games but did not start in their initial events, with the former arriving in Paris yet not competing and the latter sustaining a collarbone injury; Taduran continued to serve in the delegation as a representative for the Philippines.

After the Philippines became a member of the International Olympic Committee in 1918, the nation had to send a team to the 1924 Summer Olympics as a prerequisite. The Hawaiian Amateur Athletic Union (HAAU) invited the nation to qualify for the United States' Olympic team under the Hawaiian team as the Amateur Athletic Union (AAU) had granted the HAAU authority over the Philippines within the AAU. Later on, then-secretary of the Philippine Amateur Athletic Federation (PAAF) Camilo Osías sent a letter to the HAAU rejecting the invite. He stated that the Philippines would compete at the Games under the auspices of the PAAF as a member of the Far Eastern Athletic Association as opposed to competing under the auspices of the HAAU.

Before the opening ceremony of the Games, the French Olympic Committee decided that the flag of the United States would have to be displayed alongside the flag of the Philippines during the Parade of Nations and in the event of a possible podium finish, as the PAAF was attached to the American Olympic Association at the time. Flagbearer Nepomuceno and Catalon unsuccessfully protested the decision, as other nations with similar statuses did not have to follow the same procedure. Nepomuceno participated in two events, the men's 100 meters and the 200 meters. He failed to advance from the preliminary races of both events.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Philippines at the 1924 Summer Olympics” is sporting event delegation. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Philippines, Summer and Olympics, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1924, 1918—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Philippines, Summer and Olympics is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “sporting event delegation” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2546283. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1924 and 1918.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Philippines at the 1924 Summer Olympics”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Philippines at the 1924 Summer Olympics primary sources, Philippines at the 1924 Summer Olympics archive and Philippines research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Philippines at the 1924 Summer Olympics”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Philippines at the 1924 Summer Olympics” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.