Pepsi Number Fever
contest incident

Pepsi Number Fever, also known as the 349 incident, was a promotion held by PepsiCo in the Philippines in 1992; the promotion led to riots and the deaths of at least five people.
Promotion
In February 1992, Pepsi Philippines (PCPPI) announced they would print numbers ranging from 001 to 999 inside the caps (crowns) of Pepsi, 7 Up, Mountain Dew and Mirinda bottles. Certain numbers could be redeemed for prizes, which ranged from 100 pesos (about US$4) to 1 million pesos for a grand prize, roughly US$40,000 in 1992, at the time equivalent to 611 times the average monthly salary in the Philippines.
Pepsi allocated a total of US$2 million for prizes. Marketing specialist Pedro Vergara based Pepsi Number Fever on similar, moderately successful promotions previously held in Latin America, Vergara's geographic area of expertise. In April 1992, one month before the 349 incident, a garbled fax led to the wrong winning number being announced on television in Chile, leading to what the Philippine Senate later called a "similar fiasco". The promotion, now known as Numeromania, also later ran in Poland in 1995; however, it did not cause as much controversy.
Pepsi Number Fever was initially successful, increasing Pepsi's monthly sales from $10 million to $14 million and its market share from 19.4% to 24.9%. The winning numbers were announced on television nightly. By May, 51,000 prizes had been redeemed, including 17 grand prizes, and the campaign was extended beyond the originally planned end date of May 8 by another 5 weeks.
“Pepsi Number Fever” enters the record as contest incident. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Pepsi, Number and Fever can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Pepsi Number Fever” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Pepsi, Number and Fever provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q96398798. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1992 and 1995.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Pepsi Number Fever”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Pepsi Number Fever primary sources, Pepsi Number Fever archive and Pepsi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pepsi Number Fever”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Pepsi Number Fever” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.