CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Philip Marcus Levy

British psychologist

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ98034464 ↗
Source-derived summary

Philip Marcus Levy (1934 – 2011) was a British psychologist who specialised in the field of mathematical psychology.

Life

Phil Levy was born in 1934 in Redcar, North Riding of Yorkshire but grew up in Leeds where he was a pupil at Leeds Grammar School. He took his first degree at the University of Leeds followed by a PhD on discriminant analysis at the University of Birmingham (1960). He stayed at Birmingham, initially as a research fellow and then as lecturer and senior lecturer. He was appointed the first chair in psychology at the University of Lancaster in 1972.

He was active in the British Psychological Society and edited the British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. He was elected president of the society in 1978. In his presidential address he called on psychologists to reflect on the assumptions underlying the science. As he said: I feel that we have a simplified view of science, perhaps due - for understandable sociohistorical reasons - for our anxious desire to receive the accolade of being 'scientific' [...] I believe that science is much more a matter of social exchange than many of us are prepared to admit.

Work

His expertise was in mathematical and statistical psychology.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Philip Marcus Levy” as british psychologist. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Philip, Marcus and Levy.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1934, 2011, 1960, 1972—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1934-01-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Philip, Marcus and Levy providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Philip Marcus Levy”, the useful work is to connect “british psychologist” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q98034464. VIAF identifies the subject as 164206526. The Library of Congress control number is n84126673. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1934, 2011, 1960 and 1972.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Philip Marcus Levy”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Philip Marcus Levy primary sources, Philip Marcus Levy archive and Philip research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Philip Marcus Levy”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Philip Marcus Levy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.