CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Phedimus daeamensis

taxon

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 6, 2025
Entity authorityQ132811600 ↗
Source-derived summary

Phedimus daeamensis is a species of flowering plant in the family Crassulaceae, endemic to Mt. Daeam in South Korea. It was first described in 2022 by Tae-Young Choi, Dong Chan Son, Takashi Shiga, and Soo-Rang Lee.

Taxonomy and classification

The genus Phedimus was classified within Sedum prior to 1995. Phedimus daeamensis belongs to the subgenus Aizoon and is most closely related to Phedimus middendorffianus and Phedimus takesimensis.

Distribution and habitat

This species is found exclusively on Mt. Daeam in Korea, growing at altitudes of approximately 1000 meters. It thrives in rocky cliffs and crevices.

Etymology

The species name daeamensis is derived from Mt. Daeam, the locality where the plant was first discovered.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Phedimus daeamensis” as taxon. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2022, 1995, 1000—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Phedimus, daeamensis and taxon can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as taxon. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 6, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q132811600. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2022, 1995 and 1000.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Phedimus daeamensis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Phedimus daeamensis primary sources, Phedimus daeamensis archive and Phedimus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Phedimus daeamensis”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Phedimus daeamensis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.