CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Phantastica

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ140607198 ↗
Source-derived summary

Phantastica: Die Betäubenden und Erregenden Genussmittel für Ärzte und Nichtärzte, also known as Phantastica: Narcotic and Stimulant Substances for Physicians and Laypeople, is a classic 1924 book about psychoactive drugs by the German pharmacologist Louis Lewin (1850–1929).

In the book, Lewin extensively reviews psychoactive drugs and classifies them into five main categories, including "euphorica" (euphoriants), "phantastica" (hallucinogens), "inebriantia" (depressants), "hypnotica" (hypnotics), and "excitantia" (stimulants).

It covers the "euphorica" opium and morphine, codeine and other opioids, and coca and cocaine; the "phantastica" peyote and mescaline, cannabis, fly agaric (Amanita muscaria), nightshade deliriants, Banisteriopsis caapi and ayahuasca, Gelsemium sempervirens (yellow jessamine), and loco herbs (locoweed; Fabaceae species); the "inebriantia" alcohol, chloroform, ether, petroleum benzine, and nitrous oxide; the "hypnotica" chloral, barbital (Veronal), paraldehyde, sulfonmethane (Sulphonal), potassium bromide, kava kava, and kanna; and the "excitantia" camphor, betel, khat, caffeine and coffee, tea, kola nut, maté, Ilex cassine, pasta guarana, cocoa, tobacco, parica, arsenic, and mercury.

The book has been translated into multiple other languages and reprinted many times. It was translated into English by P. H. A. Wirth in 1931. Phantastica is regarded as Lewin's magnum opus. Aldous Huxley read the English translation soon after it was released and the book had a considerable impact on him, leading to his 1931 A Treatise on Drugs essay and his eventual experimentation with psychedelic drugs like mescaline and LSD as well as associated books like The Doors of Perception (1954).

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Phantastica” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Phantastica, Open-knowledge and entry.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1924, 1850, 1929, 1931—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Phantastica, Open-knowledge and entry providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Phantastica”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q140607198. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1924, 1850, 1929 and 1931.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Phantastica”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Phantastica primary sources, Phantastica archive and Phantastica research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Phantastica”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Phantastica” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.