CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ochrophyte

phylum of stramenopiles

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 31, 2026
Entity authorityQ1048772
Source-derived summary

Ochrophytes, also known as heterokontophytes or stramenochromes, are a phylum of algae. They are the photosynthetic stramenopiles, a group of eukaryotes, organisms with a cell nucleus, characterized by the presence of two unequal flagella, one of which has tripartite hairs called mastigonemes. In particular, they are characterized by photosynthetic organelles or plastids enclosed by four membranes, with membrane-bound compartments called thylakoids organized in piles of three, chlorophyll a and c as their photosynthetic pigments, and additional pigments such as β-carotene and xanthophylls. Ochrophytes are one of the most diverse lineages of eukaryotes, containing ecologically important algae such as brown algae and diatoms. They are classified either as phylum Ochrophyta, Heterokontophyta or as subphylum Ochrophytina within phylum Gyrista. Their plastids are of red algal origin.

Etymology

Throughout history, different names have been used to describe photosynthetic stramenopiles. The more widely used name is the phylum —or division, in botanical nomenclature— Ochrophyta, based on the golden alga Ochromonas. This name was first coined by evolutionary biologist Thomas Cavalier-Smith in 1986 as Ochrista, later renamed to Ochrophyta to comply with the recommendations of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. In 2018, the same author lowered it to a subphylum inside phylum Gyrista, and modified the name to Ochrophytina to match the -phytina suffix used for botanical subdivisions.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Ochrophyte” as phylum of stramenopiles. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1986, 2018—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Ochrophyte, phylum and stramenopiles can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as phylum of stramenopiles. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1048772. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1986 and 2018.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ochrophyte”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ochrophyte primary sources, Ochrophyte archive and Ochrophyte research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ochrophyte”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Ochrophyte” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.