Peugeot Roa
motor vehicle

The Peugeot RD and Roa are a series of cars produced by Iran Khodro from 1998 to 2012. The car is a combination of Paykan and Peugeot 405. The body of Roa is a copy from Peugeot 405 and its engine and chassis are developed and modified from Iran Khodro's Paykan's chassis. Contrary to all other Peugeot 405 versions, the Roa is a rear-wheel drive car.
Engine
Technically wise, The engine is the Rootes 1.6 Hillman Avenger (which were used on Paykans since late 70s) and was mated to the Hunter drivetrain and suspension.
A revised model released in 2010 known as Peugeot Roa uses 1,700 cc CNG engine. In older models, Iran Khodro used a modified version of the Paykan's 1.6-litre engine.
The engine specifications are as follows:
Engine type: Inline-four-cylinder; four-stroke; 1,599 cc (1,697 cc)
No. of bearings: 5
Bore: 87.35 mm (1600-1700)
Stroke: 66.7 mm (1600)
Cylinder head: Aluminum
Engine block: Cast iron
Maximum power:
1600: 61 kW (83 PS; 82 hp) at 5,000 rpm
1700: 66 kW (90 PS; 89 hp) at 5,000 rpm
Maximum torque: [135] (140) Nm at 3,000 rpm [1600cc] (1700cc)
Compression ratio: 9.5:1 (both)
Ignition sequence: 1-3-4-2
References
Peugeot Roa users' manual, Iran Khodro Co.
The public source identifies “Peugeot Roa” as motor vehicle. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Peugeot, motor and vehicle.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Peugeot Roa”, the useful work is to connect “motor vehicle” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3333392. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1998, 2012, 2010 and 1600.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Peugeot Roa”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Peugeot Roa primary sources, Peugeot Roa archive and Peugeot research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Peugeot Roa”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Peugeot Roa” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.