CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Feodosiy Petsyna

archbishop in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (1950-2010)

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 2, 2024
Entity authorityQ2694432
Source-derived summary

Feodosiy Petsyna (Ukrainian: Феодосiй Пецина; 6 April 1950 – 23 July 2010) was an archbishop in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.

From 1994 to 2006, Petsyna was the Archbishop of Drohobych and Sambir in the Patriarchate of Kiev. From 2007 until his death, he held the same title in the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Feodosiy Petsyna” as archbishop in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (1950-2010). Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1950, 2010, 1994, 2006—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1950-04-06. The account is most persuasive where Feodosiy, Petsyna and archbishop can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the places & architecture register because the source frames it as archbishop in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (1950-2010). Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 2, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q2694432. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1950, 2010, 1994 and 2006.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Feodosiy Petsyna”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Feodosiy Petsyna primary sources, Feodosiy Petsyna archive and Feodosiy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Feodosiy Petsyna”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Feodosiy Petsyna” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.