CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Petrilje

village in Jablanica District, Serbia

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ3104268 ↗
Source-derived summary

Petrilje is a village in the municipality of Medveđa, Serbia. According to the 2002 census, the village has a population of 63 people.

History

The village was mentioned in the late middle ages as

"Arbanashka Petrila" which translates into "The Albanian Petrila" and indicates an Albanian presence The village was mentioned in 1566-1574 as Arbanashka Petrila.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Petrilje” is village in Jablanica District, Serbia. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Petrilje, village and Jablanica, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2002, 1566, 1574—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Petrilje, village and Jablanica is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “village in Jablanica District, Serbia” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3104268. Authority coordinates are 42.791, 21.553. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2002, 1566 and 1574.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Petrilje”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Petrilje primary sources, Petrilje archive and Petrilje research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Petrilje”?
  2. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
  3. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Petrilje” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.