CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Peter and John

2015 film directed by Jay Craven

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ65054552 ↗
Source-derived summary

Peter and John is a 2015 American drama film written and directed by Jay Craven and starring Jacqueline Bisset and Christian Coulson. It is based on Guy de Maupassant's novel Pierre and Jean.

Plot

Cast

Jacqueline Bisset as Julia Roland

Christian Coulson as Peter Roland

Diane Guerrero as Lucia

Shane Patrick Kearns as John Roland

Gordon Clapp as Charles Roland

Gary Farmer as "Smoke"

Christopher James Baker as Jake Rivers

Susan Kelechi Watson as Patience

Production

The film was shot in Nantucket.

Nomination

The film was nominated for a 2016 New England Emmy Award.

Editorial summary

“Peter and John” enters the record as 2015 film directed by Jay Craven. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Peter, John and film can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful identification and reception guide that helps separate the work itself from editions, performances, ownership and later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015, 2016—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2015-06-27. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Peter, John and film.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Peter and John” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Peter, John and film provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q65054552. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2015 and 2016.

Critical limits

Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Peter and John”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Peter and John primary sources, Peter and John archive and Peter research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Peter and John”?
  2. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
  3. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Peter and John” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.