CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Haji Parvej Ahmad

Indian politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 18, 2025
Entity authorityQ61052828 ↗
Source-derived summary

Haji Parvez Ahmad is a Samajwadi Party politician who has served as a Member of the Legislative Assembly in the state of Uttar Pradesh, India. He was elected by a margin of 414 votes to the Legislative Assembly of Uttar Pradesh in 2012 from Allahabad South constituency, when his closest rival was Nand Gopal Gupta of the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP). He lost the same seat to Gupta, who had moved from the BSP to the Bharatiya Janata Party, in the 2017 elections. The winning margin on that occasion was 28,587 votes.

Editorial summary

“Haji Parvej Ahmad” enters the record as indian politician. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Haji, Parvej and Ahmad can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2012, 2017—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Haji, Parvej and Ahmad.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Haji Parvej Ahmad” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Haji, Parvej and Ahmad provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 18, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q61052828. The first chronological checks are 2012 and 2017.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Haji Parvej Ahmad”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Haji Parvej Ahmad primary sources, Haji Parvej Ahmad archive and Haji research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Haji Parvej Ahmad”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Haji Parvej Ahmad” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.