CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Gyalectaria diluta

species of fungus

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 1, 2025
Entity authorityQ21270960 ↗
Source-derived summary

Gyalectaria diluta is a species of crustose lichen in the family Coccotremataceae, first found in inland rainforests of British Columbia. This pale, crust-forming lichen grows on the bark of conifer trees in very humid old-growth forests, where it forms small patches that bleach the underlying bark to whitish or pale green-grey colours. It is found from British Columbia to Montana and Idaho, typically growing on smooth bark of young cedar saplings beneath mature forest canopies that have remained undisturbed for centuries.

Taxonomy

The species was formally described in 2009 by Curtis Björk, Göran Thor and Tim Wheeler. The holotype, collected from the bark of western redcedar (Thuja plicata) in old-growth forest near St. Paul Lake, Montana, is preserved in the Canadian Museum of Nature. The epithet diluta alludes to the lichen's pale, "diluted" colour. Molecular work in 2010 demonstrated that the "gyalectoid" Pertusaria species form a clade with a sister relationship to Coccotrema and were therefore transferred to the new genus Gyalectaria in family Coccotremataceae.

Morphologically the lichen resembles several eight-spored members of Pertusaria, especially P. carneopallida, P. gyalectoides and P. jamesii. It differs from P. carneopallida in lacking gyrophoric acid (C− versus a pink C+ flash) and in having a far more pronounced perihymenial "muff".

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Gyalectaria diluta” as species of fungus. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Gyalectaria, diluta and species.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2009, 2010—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Gyalectaria, diluta and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Gyalectaria diluta”, the useful work is to connect “species of fungus” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 1, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q21270960. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2009 and 2010.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Gyalectaria diluta”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Gyalectaria diluta primary sources, Gyalectaria diluta archive and Gyalectaria research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gyalectaria diluta”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Gyalectaria diluta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.