CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Persoonia subtilis

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 29, 2024
Entity authorityQ18075616
Source-derived summary

Persoonia subtilis is a plant in the family Proteaceae and is endemic to south-east Queensland. It is a spreading to low-lying shrub with many stems, branchlets that are hairy when young, linear leaves and yellow flowers in groups of up to eighteen on a rachis up to 50 mm (2.0 in) long.

Description

Persoonia subtilis is a spreading to low-lying shrub that typically grows to a height of 15–100 cm (5.9–39.4 in) with many stems, and young branchlets covered with greyish to brownish hairs. The leaves are linear, 15–50 mm (0.59–1.97 in) long and 0.4–0.8 mm (0.016–0.031 in) wide that curve upwards, with a groove on the lower surface. The flowers are arranged in groups of up to eighteen along a rachis up to 50 mm (2.0 in) long that usually continues to grow after flowering, each flower on a hairy pedicel 2–8 mm (0.079–0.315 in) long with a leaf or scale leaf at its base. The tepals are yellow and 7–10 mm (0.28–0.39 in) long. Flowering mainly occurs from November to January and the fruit is a green drupe with purple stripes.

Taxonomy

Persoonia subtilis was first formally described in 1994 by Peter Weston and Lawrie Johnson in the journal Telopea from specimens collected in 1990 near the falls on Mimosa Creek on the Blackdown Tableland.

Distribution and habitat

This geebung grows in forest and woodland in the area between the Blackdown Tableland, Carnarvon Range and Barakula in south-eastern Queensland.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Persoonia subtilis” as species of plant. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1994, 1990—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Persoonia, subtilis and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of plant. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 29, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q18075616. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1994 and 1990.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Persoonia subtilis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Persoonia subtilis primary sources, Persoonia subtilis archive and Persoonia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Persoonia subtilis”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Persoonia subtilis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.