Personalized genomics
discipline of human genetics

Personalized genomics is the human genetics-derived study of analyzing and interpreting individualized genetic information by genome sequencing to identify genetic variations compared to the library of known sequences. International genetics communities have spared no effort from the past and have gradually cooperated to prosecute research projects to determine DNA sequences of the human genome using DNA sequencing techniques. The methods that are the most commonly used are whole exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing. Both approaches are used to identify genetic variations. Genome sequencing became more cost-effective over time, and made it applicable in the medical field, allowing scientists to understand which genes are attributed to specific diseases.
Personalized medicine is an emerging practice in medicine that develops patient-specific treatments based on an individual's genetic profile. The treatment enables patients to experience maximized therapeutic effectiveness and minimized adverse effects. Personalized medicine has been widely accepted, and future-oriented changes in policy and infrastructure are implemented throughout the world to readily adopt into other fields.
History
Efforts to explore genes and heredity have been prolonged for over 100 years. From Gregor Mendel's studies of inheritance, many researchers have dedicated themselves to scientific development via new discoveries and inventions, such as the DNA double helix discovered by Rosalind Franklin and the sanger sequencing invented by Frederick Sanger.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Personalized genomics” as discipline of human genetics. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as discipline of human genetics. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q112672973. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Personalized genomics”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Personalized genomics primary sources, Personalized genomics archive and Personalized research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Personalized genomics”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Personalized genomics” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.