CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Persebi Bima

association football team in Indonesia

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ7170046 ↗
Source-derived summary

Persatuan Sepakbola Bima (simply known as Persebi) is an Indonesian football club based in Bima Regency, West Nusa Tenggara. This club competed in Liga 4.

Their main rival is Persekobi Bima City, a club based in Bima City. The derby often called Bima derby.

Editorial summary

“Persebi Bima” enters the record as association football team in Indonesia. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Persebi, Bima and association can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current 44-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Persebi, Bima and association.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Persebi Bima” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Persebi, Bima and association provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7170046. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Persebi Bima”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Persebi Bima primary sources, Persebi Bima archive and Persebi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Persebi Bima”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Persebi Bima” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.