CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Vacuum permeability

physical constant; ratio between the magnetic H-field and the magnetic B-field in classical vacuum

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ1515261 ↗
Source-derived summary

The vacuum magnetic permeability (variously vacuum permeability, permeability of free space, permeability of vacuum, magnetic constant) is the magnetic permeability in a classical vacuum. It is a physical constant, conventionally written as μ0 (pronounced "mu nought" or "mu zero"), approximately equal to 4π × 10−7 H/m (by the former definition of the ampere). It quantifies the strength of the magnetic field induced by an electric current. Expressed in terms of SI base units, it has the unit kg⋅m⋅s−2⋅A−2. It can be also expressed in terms of SI derived units, N⋅A−2, H·m−1, or T·m·A−1, which are all equivalent.

Since the revision of the SI in 2019 (when the values of e and h were fixed as defined quantities), μ0 is an experimentally determined constant with its value proportional to the dimensionless fine-structure constant, which is known to a relative uncertainty of 1.6×10−10, with no other dependencies with experimental uncertainty. Its value in SI units as recommended by CODATA is:

This is equal to 4π × [1 − (1.3 ± 1.6) × 10−10] × 10−7 N/A2, with a relative deviation (of order 10−10, i.e. less than a part per billion) from the former defined value that is within its uncertainty.

The terminology of permeability and susceptibility was introduced by William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin in 1872. The modern notation of permeability as μ and permittivity as ε has been in use since the 1950s.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Vacuum permeability” is physical constant; ratio between the magnetic H-field and the magnetic B-field in classical vacuum. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Vacuum, permeability and physical, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2019, 1872—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Vacuum, permeability and physical is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “physical constant; ratio between the magnetic H-field and the magnetic B-field in classical vacuum” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1515261. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2019 and 1872.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Vacuum permeability”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Vacuum permeability primary sources, Vacuum permeability archive and Vacuum research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Vacuum permeability”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Vacuum permeability” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.