CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Perichelydia

clade of reptiles including turtles and their extinct close relatives

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ64043742
Source-derived summary

Perichelydia (from Greek peri "near" and chelys "turtle") is a clade within Pantestudines (turtles and their extinct relatives) known from the Middle Jurassic to Holocene. Alongside crown group Testudines, it also contains Helochelydridae, which is known from the Cretaceous of Europe and North America, Sichuanchelyidae from the Middle Jurassic to Paleocene of Asia and Europe, Meiolaniformes, which is known from the Cretaceous to Holocene of South America, Australia and Oceania, and Spoochelys, known from the Mid-Cretaceous Griman Creek Formation of Australia. Kallokibotion from the Late Cretaceous of Europe is also considered part of this group. Several other groups, including the proposed clade Angolachelonia (containing Thalassochelydia and Sandownidae), Paracryptodira, Macrobaenidae, Sinemydidae and Xinjiangchelyidae, which are sometimes considered members of Cryptodira, have also been found outside crown Testudines in several analyses. These groups are usually considered to be closer to the crown group than the other members of Perichelydia.

The clade Perichelydia was created by W. G. Joyce in 2017. They are distinguished from other mesochelydians by two characters: the presence of processus trochlearis oticum and a closed interpterygoid vacuity.

Cladogram after Tong et al. 2022:

Cladogram of Perichelydia after Miller et al.

Editorial summary

“Perichelydia” enters the record as clade of reptiles including turtles and their extinct close relatives. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Perichelydia, clade and reptiles can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2017, 2022—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Perichelydia, clade and reptiles.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Perichelydia” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Perichelydia, clade and reptiles provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q64043742. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2017 and 2022.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Perichelydia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Perichelydia primary sources, Perichelydia archive and Perichelydia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Perichelydia”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Perichelydia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.