CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Pergolide

chemical compound

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ415752
Source-derived summary

Pergolide, sold under the brand name Permax and Prascend (veterinary) among others, is an ergoline-based dopamine receptor agonist used in some countries for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Parkinson's disease is associated with reduced dopamine synthesis in the substantia nigra of the brain. Pergolide acts on many of the same receptors as dopamine to increase receptor activity.

It was patented in 1978 and approved for medical use in 1989. In 2007, pergolide was withdrawn from the U.S. market for human use after several published studies revealed a link between the drug and increased rates of valvular heart disease. However, a veterinary form of pergolide, marketed under the trade name Prascend, is permitted for the treatment of pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction (PPID) also known as equine Cushing's syndrome (ECS) in horses.

Medical uses

Pergolide is no longer available for use by humans in the United States, however, it is still used in various other countries, such as in the EU, where it is only recommended for patients who cannot take other treatments.

Pergolide has also been tested for use in treatment of restless leg syndrome and hyperprolactinemia.

Pergolide is currently available for veterinary use. Under the trade name Prascend, manufactured by Boehringer Ingelheim, it is commonly used in horses for the treatment of pituitary hyperplasia at the pars intermedia, also known as Equine Cushing's Syndrome (ECS).

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Pergolide” as chemical compound. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Pergolide, chemical and compound.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1978, 1989, 2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Pergolide, chemical and compound providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Pergolide”, the useful work is to connect “chemical compound” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q415752. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1978, 1989 and 2007.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pergolide”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pergolide primary sources, Pergolide archive and Pergolide research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pergolide”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Pergolide” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.