CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Pergamon 2nd Life

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ15839964
Source-derived summary

Pergamon 2nd Life is a joint art project created by the author, mime artist, and photographer Andrey Alexander from Moscow, Russia, together with the author, circumnavigator, and producer Angelika Gebhard from Bad Wiessee, Germany. In a photographic installation extending over 30 m (98 feet) in length and up to 4 m (13 feet) high they recreated the missing parts of the Gigantomachy frieze of the Pergamon Altar.

Artistically inspired reconstruction

The fragments of the Great Altar, which were excavated by archeologists under the direction of Carl Humann in the area of ancient Pergamon in 1878, have numerous empty surfaces. The missing parts and figures of the gods and giants depicted in the original 113 m (370 feet) Gigantomachy frieze were added by Andrey Alexander in the form of photos and drawings he had made of present-day athletes, actors, and of fragments of ancient sculptures.

In a five-year process, these photographs were then edited with respect to color, surface structure, and elaboration of the details and inserted into the gaps of the remaining marble fragments. The result is a fictional, artistically inspired reconstruction of the original. Leading European archeologists and scientists were consulted for advice on the project.

Exhibitions

The photographic installation celebrated its public world premiere in the Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts in Moscow from April 22, 2013, through July 21, 2013. Video and audio installations complemented the exhibition which attracted around 300,000 visitors. From June 30 through August 2, 2015, the photographic installation was exhibited in the Shchusev Museum of Architecture in Moscow.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Pergamon 2nd Life” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1878, 2013, 2015—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Pergamon, Life and Open-knowledge can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15839964. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1878, 2013 and 2015.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pergamon 2nd Life”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pergamon 2nd Life primary sources, Pergamon 2nd Life archive and Pergamon research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pergamon 2nd Life”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Pergamon 2nd Life” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.