CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Peptidiphaga gingivicola

genus of bacteria

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ112204998 ↗
Source-derived summary

Peptidiphaga gingivicola is a Gram-positive, non-spore forming, coccus shaped bacterium. Coccus are spherical and generally round in shape. Coccus are differentiated by their groupings that can range from chains, groups, or grape-like clusters. Peptidiphaga gingivicola was observed to grow in groups of 2-5 cocci between 0.2-0.9 mm in diameter. Growth was observed when cultured under anaerobic conditions between 33 and 40 degrees celsius on Blood Brucella agar for 4 days. Peptidiphaga gingivicola has been cultured from patients with periodontal disease, primarily caused by bacterial plaque formation on the gum and teeth of the oral cavity. The microbe is known to break down peptides of the gum causing tissue damage and tooth decay, leading to serious implications for oral health.

Nomenclature

Peptidiphaga gingivicola belongs to the Actinomycetaceae family of bacteria and is located on a branch of the tree with no named members, therefore it can be identified as a new species to the Peptidiphaga genus. Peptidiphaga comes from the term "peptide" which are short chains of amino acids and Greek root "phago" meaning eater, which can be translated to "peptide eater". The species name is indicative of the location of the microbe, where gingivicola comes from the Latin root "gingiva" indicating the "gum" of the oral cavity and Latin root "cola" specifies "inhabitant".

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Peptidiphaga gingivicola” as genus of bacteria. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Peptidiphaga, gingivicola and genus.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 213-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Peptidiphaga, gingivicola and genus providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Peptidiphaga gingivicola”, the useful work is to connect “genus of bacteria” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q112204998. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Peptidiphaga gingivicola”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Peptidiphaga gingivicola primary sources, Peptidiphaga gingivicola archive and Peptidiphaga research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Peptidiphaga gingivicola”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Peptidiphaga gingivicola” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.