CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Peperomia trichophylla

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ15605646 ↗
Source-derived summary

Peperomia trichophylla is a species of epiphyte in the genus Peperomia. It was first described by John Gilbert Baker and published in the book "Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 21: 436. 1885.". It primarily grows on wet tropical biomes. The species name came from the English word wikt:tricho- + wikt:phyllon, which means Hairy leaf. Its Conservation Status is Threatened.

Description

Weak, flexible, and heavily pilose stems. Leaf with a 1 1/2–2 inch long blade.

When held up to the light, the midrib and lateral veins, as well as the anastomosing connecting veinlets, are clearly apparent; the petiole is between 1/2 and 3/4 inches long. The leaf is oblong at the apex, cuneate in the lower half, and membranous in texture.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Peperomia trichophylla” as species of plant. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1885—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Peperomia, trichophylla and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of plant. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15605646. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1885.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Peperomia trichophylla”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Peperomia trichophylla primary sources, Peperomia trichophylla archive and Peperomia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Peperomia trichophylla”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Peperomia trichophylla” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.