CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Peng Peng

footballer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ108248712
Source-derived summary

Peng Peng (Chinese: 彭鹏; born 24 November 2000) is a Chinese professional footballer currently playing as a goalkeeper for Shenzhen Peng City.

Club career

Peng joined Shanghai Shenhua's youth academy in 2018 after the club bought Genbao Football Base's under-19 players. He would be loaned out to second tier club Shanghai Shenxin for the 2019 China League One season, where he would make his professional debut on 9 March 2019 against Changchun Yatai in a 4-1 defeat. His loan was terminated early and he subsequently joined another second tier club in Qingdao Huanghai on 19 July 2019. His season would end early after he broke his toe after only his second appearance for the team, however despite his small contribution he was part of the team achieved promotion to the Chinese Super League at the end of the season.

On 8 January 2020, Peng joined China League Two club Kunshan permanently. The team would eventually receive a late promotion and participated the 2020 China League One following the disbandment of Tianjin Tianhai. Peng would make his debut in a league game on 13 September 2020 against Sichuan Jiuniu in a 2-0 victory. He would go on to take the opportunity to establish himself as a vital member within the team that won the division and promotion to the top tier at the end of the 2022 China League One campaign.

Career statistics

As of match played 30 May 2026.

Editorial summary

“Peng Peng” enters the record as footballer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Peng and footballer can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000, 2018, 2019, 2020—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2000-11-24. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Peng and footballer.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Peng Peng” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Peng and footballer provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q108248712. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000, 2018, 2019 and 2020.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Peng Peng”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Peng Peng primary sources, Peng Peng archive and Peng research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Peng Peng”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Peng Peng” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.