CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Peggy Santiglia

American singer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ7160734 ↗
Source-derived summary

Margaret "Peggy" Santiglia (born May 4, 1944) is an American pop singer of the "girl group era". She is perhaps best known for the 1963 pop hit "My Boyfriend's Back" as lead singer for The Angels when she was eighteen years old.

Biography

Santiglia was born in Belleville, New Jersey, to Pietro (Peter) Santiglia and Michelina (Margaret) (née Gallina) where she was raised in a musical Italian family with her two older siblings, Joseph and Anna. Pietro immigrated to the United States when he was 18, bringing with him many musical talents. An accomplished musician, Pietro played clarinet, mandolin and guitar locally and statewide in several community orchestras.

Career: 1950s

In 1958, while still in elementary school, Santiglia met childhood friends Denise Ferri and Arleen Lanzotti. At the suggestion of a teacher, the three girls performed in their school's talent show to much acclaim, and formed the all-girl group, The Delicates. Starting out at the Brill Building in New York City under the management of Ted Eddy (né Ted Eddy Simonetti; 1902–1985) (Louis Prima's manager), they recorded for the Tender, Unart, United Artists and Roulette labels.

The Delicates were most famous for writing the Murray The K theme songs, most notably "Meusurray," and "The Submarine Race Watchers Theme," and appearing at many Murray the K concerts, including several at the Brooklyn Fox Theatre.

In 1959, The Delicates released a song that they wrote called "Black and White Thunderbird" on the Unart label.

Editorial summary

“Peggy Santiglia” enters the record as american singer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Peggy, Santiglia and American can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1944, 1963, 1958, 1902—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1944-05-04. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Peggy, Santiglia and American.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Peggy Santiglia” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Peggy, Santiglia and American provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7160734. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1944, 1963, 1958 and 1902.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Peggy Santiglia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Peggy Santiglia primary sources, Peggy Santiglia archive and Peggy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Peggy Santiglia”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Peggy Santiglia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.