CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Pedro Francisco de Lanini

Spanish playwright

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 29, 2025
Entity authorityQ5857884 ↗
Source-derived summary

Pedro Francisco de Lanini y Sagredo (c.1640 – c.1715) was a playwright of the Spanish Golden Age. He was a prolific writer of both dramas and farces. He was particularly known for his many entremés. In addition to being a playwright he also worked as a censor of plays for the Spanish authorities.

Lanini completed the play, Santa Rosa del Perú, which had been left unfinished by Agustín Moreto y Cavana at his death.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Pedro Francisco de Lanini” as spanish playwright. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1640, 1715—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1640. The account is most persuasive where Pedro, Francisco and Lanini can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as spanish playwright. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 29, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5857884. VIAF identifies the subject as 86011996. The Library of Congress control number is nr2001041234. 1 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1640 and 1715.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pedro Francisco de Lanini”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pedro Francisco de Lanini primary sources, Pedro Francisco de Lanini archive and Pedro research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pedro Francisco de Lanini”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Pedro Francisco de Lanini” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.