CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Saga Pearl II

cruise ship built in 1981

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ896683
Source-derived summary

MS Saga Pearl II was a cruise ship of about 18,700 GT that was built in Germany by Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft as the Astor in 1981. After short unsuccessful operations with two owners, she was bought by the East German government in 1985 and renamed Arkona. After 1990 the ship was operated by Seetours, which was acquired by P&O Princess Cruises in 1999, and then chartered to Transocean Tours as Astoria in 2002. From 2009 until 2019 she was owned by Saga Cruises as Saga Pearl II (and a short period as Quest for Adventure), then withdrawn from service, laid up as Pearl II, and scrapped in 2022.

Design and construction

Astor was built in 1981 as Yard no. 165 in the shipyard of Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft, Werk Ross, Hamburg for the newly-formed German company Hadag Cruise Line, owned by the City of Hamburg. Originally intended to be named Hammonia, the female personification of Hamburg, she was launched as Astor on 16 December 1980. As built, she measured 18,834 gross tonnage (GT) and her hull dimensions were 164.35 m (539 ft 2 in) length overall, 22.6 m (74 ft 2 in) beam and 16.1 m (52 ft 10 in) depth, with a service draught of 6.1 m (20 ft 0 in). She was powered by four 6-cylinder MAN 6L40/45 medium-speed diesel engines rated 3,300 brake horsepower (2,500 kW) each. They were geared to two controllable-pitch propellers, which gave a speed of 18 knots (33 km/h; 21 mph).

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Saga Pearl II” as cruise ship built in 1981. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1981, 1985, 1990, 1999—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Saga, Pearl and cruise can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as cruise ship built in 1981. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q896683. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1981, 1985, 1990 and 1999.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Saga Pearl II”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Saga Pearl II primary sources, Saga Pearl II archive and Saga research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Saga Pearl II”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Saga Pearl II” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.