CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Peakbagger.com

website about mountains in the United States and Canada

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ28736250
Source-derived summary

Peakbagger.com is an American free online public database of mountain summits, primarily geared towards highpointers and peakbaggers created by Greg Slayden in 1987 and launched in 2004.

Overview

Peakbagger.com offers its users the ability to log ascents, write trip reports, make lists of summits, upload GPX tracks, and add summits to its database. The Peakbagger.com database features over 200,000 individually documented summits worldwide and is a significant resource for trip reports and route directions, especially for obscure summits.

Notable users of Peakbagger.com include Eric Gilbertson.

Peakbagger.com has garnered criticism for promoting trespassing, as some specific peaks, especially certain county high points, are on private property. Despite this, Peakbagger explicitly states on its front page that it does not condone any dangerous or illegal activity, and peaks that are on private land are tagged as such.

History

Peakbagger.com was originally devised by American mountaineer and programmer Greg Slayden in 1987, initially being a simple text file listing mountains. In 1997, the Peakbagger.com domain was launched, with the mountain database being released in 2004. Peakbagger.com has had its functionality continually updated since, but had its last major visual update in 2004.

At some point in the 2010s, a free Peakbagger app was developed by Andrew Kirmse for IOS and Android devices.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Peakbagger.com” as website about mountains in the United States and Canada. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Peakbagger, website and mountains.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1987, 2004, 1997—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Peakbagger, website and mountains providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Peakbagger.com”, the useful work is to connect “website about mountains in the United States and Canada” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q28736250. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1987, 2004 and 1997.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Peakbagger.com”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Peakbagger.com primary sources, Peakbagger.com archive and Peakbagger research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Peakbagger.com”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Peakbagger.com” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.