CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Peace process

ensemble of negotiations, agreements and actions to resolve an armed conflict

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ1456892
Source-derived summary

A peace process is the set of sociopolitical negotiations, agreements and actions that aim to solve a specific armed conflict.

Origin of the term

U.S. diplomat Harold H. Saunders of the Sustained Dialogue Institute coined the term "peace process" during U.S. shuttle diplomacy following the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, describing it as "a mixture of politics, diplomacy, changing relationships, negotiation, mediation, and dialogue in both official and unofficial arenas."

Definitions

Prior to an armed conflict occurring, peace processes can include the prevention of an intrastate or inter-state dispute from escalating into military conflict. The United Nations Department of Peace Operations (UNDPO) terms the prevention of disputes from escalating into armed conflicts as conflict prevention. In 2007, the United Nations Secretary-General's Policy Committee classed both initial prevention of an armed conflict and prevention of the repeat of a solved conflict as peacebuilding.

Izumi Wakugawa, advisor to the Japan-based International Peace Cooperation Program, categorises these processes into two stages: the ceasing of armed conflict and the processes of sociological reorganisation.

Ceasing of armed conflict

Non-military processes for stopping an armed conflict stage are generally classed as peacemaking. Military methods by globally organised military forces of stopping a local armed conflict are typically classed as peace enforcement.

Reorganisation

The prevention of the repeat of a solved conflict (as well as the preventing of an armed conflict from occurring at all) is usually classed as peacebuilding. UNDPO defines peacebuilding to include "measures [that] address core issues that effect the functioning of society and the State". The use of neutral military forces to sustain ceasefires during this phase, typically by United Nations peacekeeping forces, can be referred to as peacekeeping.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Peace process” is ensemble of negotiations, agreements and actions to resolve an armed conflict. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Peace, process and ensemble, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1973, 2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Peace, process and ensemble is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “ensemble of negotiations, agreements and actions to resolve an armed conflict” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1456892. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1973 and 2007.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Peace process”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Peace process primary sources, Peace process archive and Peace research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Peace process”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Peace process” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.