Paul van Lange
Dutch university teacher
Paul A.M. van Lange is a Dutch professor of psychology at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, distinguished scholar at the University of Oxford, and holds a global professorship at the University of Cologne.
In his work on trust and human cooperation, he adopts psychological, economic, and ecological approaches to the brighter and darker sides of humankind. In so doing, he studies empathy, altruism, and fairness, as well as competition, norm violations, and hate, as well as broad societal issues such as climate change, refugee crisis, or intergroup conflict (e.g., in soccer). He served as supervisor for more than 40 PhD students and Post-Docs, who completed research on topics such as cooperation in social dilemmas, gossip, bystander-effect, social mindfulness, and social relations (Vitamin S).
He has (co)authored around 250 articles in journals such as Behavioral and Brain Sciences, PNAS, Nature Human Behavior, Psychological Bulletin, and Perspectives on Psychological Science, and received various awards such as the Ig Nobel award, Ammodo Science Prize (for teams) by the Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences, the Kurt Lewin Award (mid-career), Lifetime Achievement Award by the European Association of Social Psychology, and a Lifetime Achievement Award (Van der Aa) for his contributions to behavioral science by the Dutch Royal Society of Science.
He has also (co)edited or authored 13 books on a variety of topics, including social dilemmas, how to publish, cheating and corruption, and power and politics, including Handbook of theories of social psychology (2012) and Handbook of social psychology: Basic principles (see "official website"). He is involved in many outreach activities, including contributions to (inter)national media, advice to national campaigns (SIRE, #DOESLIEF), and providing annual workshops for mayors and other professionals in the Netherlands and Europe. He has previously served as president of the Society of Experimental Social Psychology and scientific director of the Kurt Lewin Institute, is the founding editor of Current Opinion in Psychology and Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, and served as associate editor for, among others, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Psychological Science.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Paul van Lange” as dutch university teacher. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as dutch university teacher. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q23699842. VIAF identifies the subject as 12601064. The Library of Congress control number is n2005050525. 4 of 6 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2012.
Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Paul van Lange”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Paul van Lange primary sources, Paul van Lange archive and Paul research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Paul van Lange”?
- Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
- Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Paul van Lange” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.