Hart-Rouge
Canadian musical group
Hart-Rouge are a Canadian folk music group, consisting of siblings Paul Campagne, Michelle Campagne, and Suzanne Campagne.
Originally from Willow Bunch, Saskatchewan, the Campagne family are among the most notable Fransaskois personalities in Canada. Hart-Rouge was the original name of their hometown. The three previously recorded and performed with several other family members as Folle Avoine, the French name for the common wild oat, and formed Hart-Rouge with another sibling, Annette Campagne, when that band ended. During their music career, they were based at first in Winnipeg, Manitoba, and later in Montreal, Quebec.
The band performs traditional folk songs and original material in both English and French. They have also recorded some material in Canadian First Nations languages.
Annette left the band in the mid-1990s, with the band continuing as a trio with collaborating session musicians.
Connections
Their sister Carmen Campagne, who had been a member of Folle Avoine, also continued a career in music, performing independently as a children's entertainer. Their father, Émile Campagne, has also released two albums of traditional folk songs.
“Hart-Rouge” enters the record as canadian musical group. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Hart-Rouge, Canadian and musical can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Hart-Rouge” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Hart-Rouge, Canadian and musical provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3127968. VIAF identifies the subject as 146202551. The Library of Congress control number is n2005075381. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Hart-Rouge”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Hart-Rouge primary sources, Hart-Rouge archive and Hart-Rouge research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hart-Rouge”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Hart-Rouge” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.