CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Partula rosea

species of mollusc

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ2704362
Source-derived summary

Partula rosea is a species of air-breathing tropical land snail, a terrestrial pulmonate' gastropod mollusk in the family Partulidae.

Description

The length of the shell attains 22.4 mm (0.88 in).

Uses

The shell of this species was used to make lei, like Partula varia from the same island.

Distribution

This species was endemic to Huahine, French Polynesia. It was extinct in the wild, only existing in captivity.

Half the world's population of this snail was within one room at Marwell Zoo in the UK. In 2019 the species was reintroduced to the wild on Huahine.

References

Gerlach J. (2016). Icons of evolution: Pacific Island tree-snails of the family Partulidae. Phelsuma Press. ISBN 978-0-99322-033-3.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Partula rosea” is species of mollusc. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Partula, rosea and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2019, 2016—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Partula, rosea and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of mollusc” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2704362. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2019 and 2016.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Partula rosea”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Partula rosea primary sources, Partula rosea archive and Partula research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Partula rosea”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Partula rosea” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.