CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Partition regularity

Notion of largeness for collections of sets in combinatorics

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 26, 2025
Entity authorityQ7140652
Source-derived summary

In combinatorics, a branch of mathematics, partition regularity is one notion of largeness for a collection of sets.

Given a set

X

{\displaystyle X}

, a collection of subsets

S

P

(

X

)

{\displaystyle \mathbb {S} \subset {\mathcal {P}}(X)}

is called partition regular if every set A in the collection has the property that, no matter how A is partitioned into finitely many subsets, at least one of the subsets will also belong to the collection. That is,

for any

A

S

{\displaystyle A\in \mathbb {S} }

, and any finite partition

A

=

C

1

C

2

C

n

{\displaystyle A=C_{1}\cup C_{2}\cup \cdots \cup C_{n}}

, there exists an i ≤ n such that

C

i

{\displaystyle C_{i}}

belongs to

S

{\displaystyle \mathbb {S} }

. Ramsey theory is sometimes characterized as the study of which collections

S

{\displaystyle \mathbb {S} }

are partition regular.

Examples

The collection of all infinite subsets of an infinite set X is a prototypical example. In this case partition regularity asserts that every finite partition of an infinite set has an infinite cell (i.e. the infinite pigeonhole principle.)

Sets with positive upper density in

N

{\displaystyle \mathbb {N} }

: the upper density

d

¯

(

A

)

{\displaystyle {\overline {d}}(A)}

of

A

N

{\displaystyle A\subset \mathbb {N} }

is defined as

d

¯

(

A

)

=

lim sup

n

|

{

1

,

2

,

,

n

}

A

|

n

.

{\displaystyle {\overline {d}}(A)=\limsup _{n\rightarrow \infty }{\frac {|\{1,2,\ldots ,n\}\cap A|}{n}}.}

(Szemerédi's theorem)

For any ultrafilter

U

{\displaystyle \mathbb {U} }

on a set

X

{\displaystyle X}

,

U

{\displaystyle \mathbb {U} }

is partition regular: for any

A

U

{\displaystyle A\in \mathbb {U} }

, if

A

=

C

1

C

n

{\displaystyle A=C_{1}\sqcup \cdots \sqcup C_{n}}

, then exactly one

C

i

U

{\displaystyle C_{i}\in \mathbb {U} }

.

Sets of recurrence: a set R of integers is called a set of recurrence if for any measure-preserving transformation

T

{\displaystyle T}

of the probability space (Ω, β, μ) and

A

β

{\displaystyle A\in \beta }

of positive measure there is a nonzero

n

R

{\displaystyle n\in R}

so that

μ

(

A

T

n

A

)

>

0

{\displaystyle \mu (A\cap T^{n}A)>0}

.

Call a subset of natural numbers a.p.-rich if it contains arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Partition regularity” as notion of largeness for collections of sets in combinatorics. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Partition, regularity and Notion.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 408-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Partition, regularity and Notion providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Partition regularity”, the useful work is to connect “notion of largeness for collections of sets in combinatorics” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 26, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7140652. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Partition regularity”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Partition regularity primary sources, Partition regularity archive and Partition research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Partition regularity”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Partition regularity” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.