CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Parting stone

directional marker on a road or footpath

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 10, 2025
Entity authorityQ7140603
Source-derived summary

A parting stone is a monument, usually of stone, to either:

Provide direction at a fork in the road—a parting of the way, or

Commemorate a final parting, as from a loved one.

Directions

A directing parting stone shows where each leg of a road fork leads.

The earliest

Massachusetts legislation pertaining to guide-posts was on February 28, 1795. In it, the selectmen were required to erect guide-posts at the corners and angles of all roads in their towns and districts, Before that time, some individuals had set up roadside stones marking the distance or direction to some important town.

Numerous such stones were set by Paul Dudley, Chief-Justice of Massachusetts, as they bear his name or initials. It was not uncommon for well-to-do eighteenth century men to place milestones by the roadside along main thoroughfares for the convenience of travelers.

One well known example of a Dudley stone is the Roxbury Parting Stone, known locally as simply the Parting Stone.

It is located near the Norfolk House, at the corner of Centre and Roxbury Streets, on Eliot Square.

On its front or easterly face is inscribed "The / Parting / Stone / 1744 / P Dudley", with the directions on the south and north faces of "to / Dedham / x Rhode / Island" and " to / Cambridge / Watertown" respectively.

Memorials

A memorial parting stone may be erected, for example, at the departure point of a loved one's final journey.

Editorial summary

“Parting stone” enters the record as directional marker on a road or footpath. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Parting, stone and directional can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1795, 1744—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Parting, stone and directional.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Parting stone” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Parting, stone and directional provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 10, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7140603. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1795 and 1744.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Parting stone”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Parting stone primary sources, Parting stone archive and Parting research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Parting stone”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Parting stone” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.