Montanelia predisjuncta
species of fungus

Montanelia predisjuncta is a species of saxicolous (rock-dwelling) foliose lichen in the family Parmeliaceae. The lichen forms small rosettes of narrow, olive-brown to dark brown lobes that grow tightly pressed against rock surfaces in mountainous areas. It was originally described from Japan and has since been recorded from China and Russia, though some genetic studies suggest it may not be distinct from the more widespread Montanelia disjuncta. The species is characterized by its lack of powdery or granular reproductive structures, the presence of irregular pale markings on its upper surface, and its production of perlatolic and stenosporonic acids.
Taxonomy
Montanelia predisjuncta was described in 1977 by Theodore Lee Esslinger as Parmelia predisjuncta, based on saxicolous material collected on rock from Azusayama in central Japan (Shinano Province) at 1,400–1,500 m elevation. In the protologue, it was presented as closely related to P. disjuncta but consistently lacking soredia and containing perlatolic and stenosporonic acids. Esslinger also argued that it should not be treated as a "species pair" with P. disjuncta because the two differ in several additional characters. He reported that it had sometimes been mistaken for P. stygia, but separated it by differences in pseudocyphellae and by secondary chemistry, noting that the chemical races of P. stygia did not match P. predisjuncta in containing depsides.
The species was later treated in Melanelia as Melanelia predisjuncta. Divakar and co-authors segregated the Melanelia disjuncta group as the genus Montanelia using multilocus phylogenetic analyses supported by morphology and chemistry, and they made the new combination Montanelia predisjuncta.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Montanelia predisjuncta” is species of fungus. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Montanelia, predisjuncta and species, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “species of fungus” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q21313948. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1977.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Montanelia predisjuncta”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Montanelia predisjuncta primary sources, Montanelia predisjuncta archive and Montanelia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Montanelia predisjuncta”?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Montanelia predisjuncta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.