CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Silurus lithophilus

species of fish

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ5553424
Source-derived summary

Silurus lithophilus, the rock catfish (in Japanese, イワトコナマズ [iwatoko-namazu]), is a species of catfish that is endemic to the Lake Biwa basin in Japan. It primarily inhabits rocky habitats.

Silurus lithophilus is a predator that feeds on small fishes, crustaceans and insects. It is caught for food around Lake Biwa, but is usually eaten locally in Gifu Prefecture rather than exported. This species reaches a maximum length of 58.0 cm (22.8 in) and maximum weight of 1.5kg (3.3 lbs), although 21.2cm (8.3 in) is more typical.

It is most closely related to the Japanese populations of the Amur catfish, Silurus asotus. A leucistic variation of this species occurs in the wild, and appears to occur with higher frequency than in other catfishes.

Silurus lithophilus spawns in shallow, rocky areas around midnight. It synchronises it's spawning nights with a larger relative, the giant Lake Biwa catfish Silurus biwaensis, but avoids competition for spawning sites with it by spawning away from S. biwaensis, or spawning after S. biwaensis has left the spawning sites. It is thought spawning on the same nights as S. biwaensis reduces predation on S. lithophilus eggs.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Silurus lithophilus” as species of fish. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current 188-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Silurus, lithophilus and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of fish. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5553424. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Silurus lithophilus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Silurus lithophilus primary sources, Silurus lithophilus archive and Silurus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Silurus lithophilus”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Silurus lithophilus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.