CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Paranyctoides

genus of mammals (fossil)

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ30894951
Source-derived summary

Paranyctoides is an extinct genus of early eutherian mammal from the Late Cretaceous of North America and possibly Asia. It was named in 1979 by Fox for tooth and jaw material from the Dinosaur Park Formation of Alberta, which he named Paranyctoides sternbergi. Fox then named the second species P. maleficus for material from the older Milk River Formation. The species P. megakeros was named by Lillegraven and McKenna in 1986 from the "Mesaverde" Formation of Wyoming, and indeterminate species of Paranyctoides have been identified from the Kaiparowits, Wahweap, Kirtland, Hell Creek and Lance Formations of western North America. Material from the Maastrichtian Hell Creek and Lance Formations, as well as P. megakeros, have since been identified as Alostera saskatchewanensis, limiting Paranyctoides to the Santonian to Campanian in North America. In 2013 Averianov and Archibald considered P. maleficus a synonym of P. sternbergi, though this was not supported by Montellano-Ballesteros and colleagues the same year.

Species of Paranyctoides have also been identified from Uzbekistan, first being named P. aralensis by Lev Nesov in 1993 for material from the Turonian Bissekty Formation. Additional Asian specimens were found and referred to Paranyctoides expanding its range to the younger Aitym Formation, before Averianov and Archibald considered that all the Uzbek specimens belonged to the same species, which they identified as P. quadrans, being an older name Nesov had coined in 1982 for a species of Sailestes. The referral of Asian species and material to Paranyctoides was not supported by Montellano-Ballesteros and colleagues, though it was found within the genus in a phylogenetic analysis by Averinanov and Archibald.

Editorial summary

“Paranyctoides” enters the record as genus of mammals (fossil). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Paranyctoides, genus and mammals can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1979, 1986, 2013, 1993—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Paranyctoides, genus and mammals.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Paranyctoides” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Paranyctoides, genus and mammals provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q30894951. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1979, 1986, 2013 and 1993.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Paranyctoides”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Paranyctoides primary sources, Paranyctoides archive and Paranyctoides research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Paranyctoides”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Paranyctoides” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.