CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Tamara Pangelova

Soviet athletics competitor

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ2391210
Source-derived summary

Tamara Pangelova (later Dunaiska, Ukrainian: Тамара Пангелова-Дунайська, born 22 August 1943) is a retired Ukrainian middle-distance runner who specialized in the 1500 m event. She won a bronze medal at the 1971 European Championships and set a world record on 12 March 1972, both indoors. She won a gold medal at the 1972 European indoor championships in Grenoble. Later in 1972 she placed seventh at the Munich Olympics.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Tamara Pangelova” as soviet athletics competitor. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Tamara, Pangelova and Soviet.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1943, 1500, 1971, 1972—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Tamara, Pangelova and Soviet providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Tamara Pangelova”, the useful work is to connect “soviet athletics competitor” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2391210. The first chronological checks are 1943, 1500, 1971 and 1972.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Tamara Pangelova”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Tamara Pangelova primary sources, Tamara Pangelova archive and Tamara research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tamara Pangelova”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Tamara Pangelova” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.