CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Pang Ho-cheung

Hong Kong actor, writer and filmmaker

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ4707732
Source-derived summary

Edmund Pang Ho-cheung (Chinese: 彭浩翔) is a Hong Kong film director, screenwriter, producer, and novelist.

Early life

Pang was born in Hong Kong in 1973. At the age of 15, he started using a video camera to direct short films with his elder brother.

After graduating from high school, he studied abroad in Taiwan for half a year, before returning to Hong Kong, where he worked for Hong Kong Asian Television Limited as a gag show writer. He later wrote his first novel, and served as a columnist for various newspapers and magazines.

Career

In 1997, at the age of 24, Pang began 18 months of research for his first novel, Fulltime Killer. The novel went on to become extremely popular, selling more than 100,000 copies in Hong Kong. It was then reworked as a radio programme. Johnnie To adapted the novel into a feature film starring Andy Lau in 2001.

While Pang was still a television and radio host, he decided to fulfil his dream of being a film director.

Editorial summary

“Pang Ho-cheung” enters the record as hong Kong actor, writer and filmmaker. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Pang, Ho-cheung and Hong can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1973, 1997, 2001—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1973-09-22, 1973—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Pang, Ho-cheung and Hong.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Pang Ho-cheung” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Pang, Ho-cheung and Hong provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4707732. VIAF identifies the subject as 58918789. The Library of Congress control number is nr00016841. 4 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1973, 1997 and 2001.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pang Ho-cheung”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pang Ho-cheung primary sources, Pang Ho-cheung archive and Pang research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pang Ho-cheung”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Pang Ho-cheung” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.