CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Dupuytren's contracture

superficial fibromatosis arising from the soft tissue of the palm

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 20, 2026
Entity authorityQ1330254 ↗
Source-derived summary

Dupuytren's contracture (also called Dupuytren's disease, Morbus Dupuytren, Palmar fibromatosis and colloquially Viking disease, Viking hand or Celtic hand) is a condition in which one or more fingers become permanently bent in a flexed position. It is named after Guillaume Dupuytren, who first described the underlying mechanism of action, followed by the first successful operation in 1831 and publication of the results in The Lancet in 1834. It usually begins as small, hard nodules just under the skin of the palm, then worsens over time until the fingers can no longer be fully straightened. While typically not painful, some aching or itching, or pain, may be present. The ring finger followed by the little and middle fingers are most commonly affected. It can affect one or both hands. The condition can interfere with activities such as preparing food, writing, putting the hand in a tight pocket, putting on gloves, or shaking hands.

The causes of Dupuytren's contracture are not completely understood. The disease is driven by over-activation of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in response to signaling molecules including IL-1 beta, TGF-beta, EGF, and CTGF, leading to inappropriately increased formation of fibrous connective tissue. Risk factors include family history, smoking, thyroid problems, liver disease, diabetes, previous hand trauma, and epilepsy.

Editorial summary

“Dupuytren's contracture” enters the record as superficial fibromatosis arising from the soft tissue of the palm. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Dupuytren's, contracture and superficial can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1831, 1834—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Dupuytren's, contracture and superficial.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Dupuytren's contracture” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Dupuytren's, contracture and superficial provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1330254. The Library of Congress control number is sh85040014. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1831 and 1834.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dupuytren's contracture”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dupuytren's contracture primary sources, Dupuytren's contracture archive and Dupuytren's research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dupuytren's contracture”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Dupuytren's contracture” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.