CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Palaeosyops

genus of mammals (fossil)

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ149549 ↗
Source-derived summary

Palaeosyops (lit. 'ancient boar face') is an extinct genus of primitive brontothere that lived in Asia and North America during the Early to Middle Eocene. Palaeosyops was among the first brontotheres to be described scientifically, and is known from a large number of fossils, particularly from the Bridger Formation in the Green River Basin in the western United States.

The largest Palaeosyops were about the size of small cattle, exceeding 400 kilograms (880 lb) in weight. Palaeosyops was the largest mammal in its environment, and markedly larger in size than its ancestors and the more basal brontothere Eotitanops. Palaeosyops had a relatively robust skull, and is unique among the brontotheres for its quite extreme brachycephaly (a short and broad head). Gracile Palaeosyops skulls were once classified as the separate genus Limnohyops, but are now interpreted as showing sexually dimorphic differences. The dentition, overall anatomy, and inferred paleoenvironment (semitropical forests) of Palaeosyops all indicate that it had a diet and lifestyle similar to modern-day tapirs, though unlike tapirs Palaeosyops did not have a prehensile upper lip.

The species-level taxonomy of Palaeosyops is disputed. North American fossils show a general trend of increasing size and robusticity over the course of the Bridgerian. This has been interpreted as a succession of species, from P. fontinalis to P. paludosus to P. robustus.

Editorial summary

“Palaeosyops” enters the record as genus of mammals (fossil). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Palaeosyops, genus and mammals can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 218-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Palaeosyops, genus and mammals.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Palaeosyops” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Palaeosyops, genus and mammals provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q149549. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Palaeosyops”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Palaeosyops primary sources, Palaeosyops archive and Palaeosyops research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Palaeosyops”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Palaeosyops” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.