CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Packera dubia

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ15579072 ↗
Source-derived summary

Packera dubia (synonym Packera tomentosa), often known by the name woolly ragwort, is a perennial species of flowering plant in the Asteraceae family. It is native to the southeastern United States, primarily to the coastal plain but extending into some areas inland and is common throughout its range, where it typically inhabits open, sandy areas and granitic outcrops. This species produces a head of yellow flowers in late spring. Its seeds have been shown to vary in mass within a single flower head as an adaptation to improve dispersal in disturbed habitats.

Description

This plant has bright yellow flower heads with relatively small, narrow ray petals and a large central yellow disk composed of disc florets. There are around 10-13 petals on each flower head and 50-60 disc florets making up the center of the flower. These plants do not typically grow to be taller than two feet and span from 30–60 cm (1–2 ft) in height. They have leaves that grow around the base of the plant that are thin and covered with small hairs. The basal leaves are long and leaf size decreases higher up the stem. Packera dubia leaves vary in leaf margins and are either subentire, crenate, or serrate-dentate.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Packera dubia” as species of plant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Packera, dubia and species.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current 203-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Packera, dubia and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Packera dubia”, the useful work is to connect “species of plant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15579072. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Packera dubia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Packera dubia primary sources, Packera dubia archive and Packera research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Packera dubia”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Packera dubia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.