CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

PSA Masters 2011

PSA - Professional Squash Association 18TH DEC 2011 JAMES WILLSTROP: A PSA MASTER & WORLD NO1 The climax to an incredible end-of-year run by James Willstrop on the international squash circuit saw the Englishman clinch his third successive PSA Worl

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ7120584
Source-derived summary

The Punj Lloyd PSA Masters 2011 is the men's edition of the 2012 PSA Masters, which is a PSA World Series event Platinum (Prize money: $165,000). The event took place in New Delhi in India from 12 to 18 December. James Willstrop won his first PSA Masters trophy, beating Grégory Gaultier in the final.

Prize money and ranking points

For 2011, the prize purse was $165,000.

Editorial summary

“PSA Masters 2011” enters the record as pSA - Professional Squash Association 18TH DEC 2011 JAMES WILLSTROP: A PSA MASTER & WORLD NO1 The climax to an incredible end-of-year run by James Willstrop on the international squash circuit saw the Englishman clinch his third successive PSA Worl. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Masters, Professional and Squash can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011, 2012—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Masters, Professional and Squash.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“PSA Masters 2011” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Masters, Professional and Squash provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7120584. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2011 and 2012.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “PSA Masters 2011”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow PSA Masters 2011 primary sources, PSA Masters 2011 archive and Masters research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “PSA Masters 2011”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from PSA Masters 2011” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.